The culture of death

   According to the aforementioned web site  Bill 776 prohibits "partial birth abortion" even in the cases of a woman's health (most time's meaning she's depressed), however the progressmich.org/choice bunch doesn't CALL it "partial birth abortion" instead they refer to it as:

 "a rarely used, yet medically necessary abortion method and does not provide an exception to protect a woman's health (which is according the web site ) outlawed in Michigan and across the country." 

  I know lib's can't be bothered by a silly little thing like the truth but the fact is this hideous procedure is practiced every single day in America  in spite of it's apparent (?) legal status. Just ask millionaire "Killer Tiller" of Kansas fame.

 George "Killer" Tiller

http://www.dr-tiller.com/

 If it's already " outlawed here and across the country", why be all up in arms about this Bill anyway and why hasn't  brother Tiller been brought to justice?

  again and according to the article :

State legislators in Michigan were  pushing through an unnecessary and wasteful bill, which would prohibit abortion methods that were already banned by the ultra-conservative U.S. Supreme Court.  

   I would love to know what country this "ultra-conservative U.S. Supreme court" is in, I think I would like to MOVE THERE!

   But alas, the left's "culture of death" marches on and never ceases in its relentless  bending of  the truth and with new leaders and even more gruesome ways to murder children. 

  For example take the grand pooh bah of intellectual left one Peter Singer Professor of Bioethics, University Center for Human Values, Princeton University, 1999-2004, part-time, 2005- , a man  whom  the New England Journal of Medicine believes has had "more success in effecting changes in acceptable behavior" than any philosopher since Bert rand Russell. The New Yorker called him the "most influential" philosopher alive.

 Peter Singer, referred to by some as "Dr Death." Tiller must be jealous.

   I'm not going to write about his views on sexuality, not in this post anyway but I may re-visit that in another article sometime on the vile professor Singer. No, for this article I will concentrate on his views on abortion and the "women's right to choose" to kill her baby. Mr Singer, who subscribes to the philosophy that  "Any activity is ethical as long as it is consensual" fails to see that a baby doesn't necessarily "consent" to being burned to death with a saline solution and chopped into little pieces.

   Mr Singer believes it is morally ok to kill a baby up to two weeks after it is born. No wait, I'm wrong and when I'm wrong I will admit it. He DID say that but then apologized. NOW, he thinks THAT is to restrictive and it should be up to two YEARS after the child is born. If that's not bad enough, THEN you should be able to harvest its organs for any siblings you so graciously allowed to be born if THEY happen to be sick and in need of a transplant.

  Good grief people, I mean COME ON, do you REALLY support THIS kind of ghoulish philosophy? He should be ....I just had to delete everything I wrote after "He should be" because I would be arrested.

Instead I'll quote something "good" that the professor said. He said:

If infanticide under "strict" conditions were legalized, the conditions would soon be loosened, reporters would discover inequities where it was allowed in some circumstances and not others, and soon infanticide on parental demand would become standard. That's what happened with abortion. 

Ya think?

 Currently you can kill your baby with impunity, right up to the instant before it's born. Soon the sky's the limit I guess. Don't like the college they want to go to? BLAM! Hey, it's YOUR right to choose....right?

 Pro choice?

  In 2002, as an Illinois legislator,Burack Obama voted against the Induced Infant Liability Act, which would have protected babies that survived late-term abortions. That same year a similar federal law, the Born Alive Infant Protection Act, was signed by President Bush. Only 15 members of the U.S. House opposed it, and it passed the Senate unanimously on a voice vote.